Carl Baudenbacher is a Swiss jurist. He has served as a judge of the EFTA Court from September 1995 to April 2018 and was the court's president from 2003 to 2017. He was a full professor at the University of St. Gallen from 1987 to 2013 and a permanent visiting professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law from 1993 to 2004.

Status etter EFTA-domstolens og Høyesteretts avgjørelser i ”Holship-saken” i Labour Court Cases Revisited i Festskrift till Ann Numhauser-Henning (red.

EFTA Court going first In most cases. Holship is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Holship and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more EFTA Court - EU Courts This calls for an interpretation of EEA law in line with new case law of the ECJ. regardless of whether the EFTA Court has previously ruled on the question. The EFTA Court frequently cited by the EU Courts and Advocates Generals, e.g.: E-3/00. ESA v Norway (precautionary principle); E-4/09.

Holship efta court

EFTA-domstolen har definitivt ikke gjort det. EFTAs uttalelse om blokaden av Holship | FriFagbevegelse JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. The implementation record of the EEA EFTA States in this regard is consistently above the EU average, and the specific EEA institutions, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court, continue to perform the tasks accorded to them by the Agreement. Taken together, these factors ensure the credibility of the EEA as a homogenous legal area. The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) monitors compliance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway; the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States which are a part of the EEA Agreement, allowing them to participate in the Internal Market of the European Union.. ESA operates independently of the EFTA States and seeks to protect the rights of EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland was a case brought before the EFTA Court by the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority against Iceland following the Icesave dispute..

In virtually 27 Jan 2020 Former President of the EFTA Court. Professor em.

The Holship case – judgment of the Supreme Court On December 16, 2016 the Supreme Court passed a judgement regarding the case between Holship Norge AS and The Transport Workers Union. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Holship Norge AS.

The implementation record of the EEA EFTA States in this regard is consistently above the EU average, and the specific EEA institutions, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court, continue to perform the tasks accorded to them by the Agreement. Taken together, these factors ensure the credibility of the EEA as a homogenous legal area.

In May 2017, the First Judicial Summit of the EFTA Pillar was held. The Supreme Courts of Iceland and Norway, in corpore, Judges from the three highest courts of Liechtenstein (State Court, Supreme Court and Administrative Court), together with their respective legal secretaries, joined the Judges of the EFTA Court in Luxembourg on the 25th anniversary of the signing of the EEA Agreement in Oporto.

Holship and Bedriftsforbundet lost their joint appeal against this at the Borgarting Court of Appeal in September 2014. Holship had argued that the boycott was illegal, and that the framework collective agreement was in breach of the competition law and the right to free establishment within the single market. 2018-04-15 · In 2016, the EFTA Court ruled in the landmark case Holship (E-14/15) that such a system is incompatible with competition law. The Supreme Court of Norway has followed the EFTA Court.

L-1499 Luxembourg (+352) 42 10 81 (+352) 43 43 89.
Agneta ojehagen

Ronny Gjendemsjø, Assoc. Professor, University of Bergen & BECCLE:. 2 juli 2015 — Holship Norge AS som anser att den bojkott börd hänskjutits till Efta-domstolen.

94/2019). The Supreme Administrative Court referred, inter alia, to the Holship ruling of the EFTA Court. It is not clear which of the two European courts in question, the Strasbourg Court or the ECJ, will be the first to decide. But that is not the point here.
Använda resia presentkort

2017-10-26

25 32 Holship, ESA and the Commission, mainly relying on the conditions set out in the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) in Albany (C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430) and the Court’s judgment in LO (Case E-8/00 Landsorganisasjonen i Norge [2002] EFTA Ct. Rep. 114) (“LO”), claim that the priority clause goes beyond the objective of improving conditions of work and employment and therefore is not exempted from the application of the EEA competition rules. 32 Ifølge Holship, ESA og Kommisjonen, som i det vesentligste støtter seg på vilkårene fastsatt av Den europeiske unions domstol (“EU-domstolen”) i Albany (C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430) og EFTA-domstolens dom i LO (sak E-8/00 Landsorganisasjonen i Norge, Sml. 2002 s. 114) (“LO”), går fortrinnsrettsbestemmelsen lengre enn målet om å bedre arbeids- og ansettelsesvilkårene og er følgelig ikke unntatt fra anvendelsen av EØS-avtalens konkurranseregler.

Mozart opera lista

13 Sep 2018 States shall establish a court of justice (EFTA Court). ▫ Surveillance and provides for the establishment of the EFTA Court E-14/15 Holship.

Noruega - The Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions takes Holship conflict to the European Court of Human Rights The conflict between trade unions and freight entreprises in Drammen port has been ongoing since 2013 and in recent years, has become a legal dispute.

However, the Norwegian Supreme Court accepted Holship’s appeal in January 2015. They sent the case to the EFTA court in Luxembourg, in order to get a full assessment of the EU (EEA) and competition law aspects of the case. The oral hearing in the EFTA Court is set to November 11th this year.

ESA operates independently of the EFTA States and seeks to protect the rights of EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland was a case brought before the EFTA Court by the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority against Iceland following the Icesave dispute.. Following the final result of the 2011 Icelandic loan guarantee referendum, the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority (ESA) lodged a formal application with the EFTA Court. EFTA Court. Daniele Gallo. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package. This paper. A short summary of this paper.

Holship is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Holship and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more EFTA-domstolen la i formiddag fram sin uttalelse i spørsmålet norsk Høyesterett reiste, om Transportarbeiderforbundets boikottaksjoner mot selskapet Holship i Drammen er lovlig eller ikke. Uttalelsen anbefaler Høyesterett å gå imot havnearbeiderne og gi Holship rett i at boikottaksjonene er i strid med EØS-avtalen.